Leadership Theories (The Situational Approach )

The Situational Approach 
The Situational approach concentrates on the importance of the situation in the study of leadership.  A variety of people with differing personalities and from different backgrounds have emerged as effective leaders in different situations. The person who becomes the leader of the work group is thought to be the person who knows best what to do and is seen by the group as the most suitable leader in the particular situation.  The theory emphasizing the importance of the situation for managerial leadership was developed by Mary Parker Follett. 


According to Mary P Follett situational leadership involves 
●Depersonalization the giving of orders 
●Unite all concerned in a study of the situation 
●Discover the law of the situation and obey that 
●One person should not give orders to another person but both should agree to take their orders from the situation 

Paul Hersey and Kenneth H. Blanchard 
●Leadership is based on the "readiness" level of the people the leader is attempting to influence.  Readiness is the extent to which followers have the ability and willingness to accomplish a specific task. 

●Readiness (R) is divided into a continuum of four levels

●R1:Low follower readiness -It refers to followers who are both unable and unwilling and who lack commitment and motivation or who are insecure.

●R2:Low to moderate follower readiness -It refers to followers who are unable but willing and who lack ability but are motivated to make an effort; or who are unable but confident. 

●R3:Moderate to high follower readiness -It refers to followers who are able but unwilling and who are have the ability to perform but are unwilling to apply their ability ;or who are able but insecure. 

●R4:High follower readiness -It refers to followers who are both able and willing and who have the ability and commitment to perform; or who are confident. 


For each of the four levels of Maturity the appropriate style of leadership is a combination of task behaviour and relationship behaviour. 


●Task behaviour :It is the extent to which the leader provides directions for the actions of followers sets goals for them and defines their roles and how to undertake them.

●Relationship behaviour :It is the extent to which the leader engages in two -way communication with followers listens to them and provides support and encouragement. 


From the combination of task behavior and relationship behavior are derived four leadership styles:
●S 1: Telling : It emphasises high amounts of guidance but limited supportive behavior. Most appropriate for low follower readiness. 

●S 2:Selling :It emphasises high amounts of both directive and relationship behavior.  Most appropriate for low to moderate follower readiness. 

●S 3:Participating :It emphasises a high amount of two -way communication and supportive behavior but low amounts of guidance . Most appropriate for moderate to high follower readiness. 

●S 4:Delegating: It emphasises little direction or support with low levels of both task and relationship behavior . Most appropriate for high follower readiness. 





Popular posts from this blog

Vroom and Yetton's Contingency Theory

Vroom and Ye tton's  Contingency Theory  This theory is also called the Leader Participation Model. Vroom and Yetton base their analysis on two aspects of a leader's decision : ● Decision Quality: The effect that the decision has on group performance  ●Decision Acceptance : It refers to the motivation and commitment of group members in implementing the decision  Vroom and Yetton identified five leadership styles based on the degree of employee participation and power in making organizational decisions : ● Autocratic  (A-1) : The leader solves the problem himself or makes the decision alone using information available to him at that time. ● Automatic  (A-2): The leader obtains information from his subordinates but the decision on solution is his alone. ●Consultative  (C-1): The leader shares the problem with his subordinates individually . He then makes the decision which mayor may not reflect the influence of his subordinates.  ● Consultative...
Read more

Current Status of Public Administration

Current Status of Public Administration  Stages of Evolution  Paradigm 1: Politics / administration dichotomy, 1900- 1926 Paradigm 2: The principles of administration, 1926-1937                         The Challenge to Paradigm 3: 1938- 1950 Paradigm 3: Public administration as a political science, 1950-1970 Paradigm 4: Public administration as a management, 1956- 1970 Paradigm 5: Public administration as public administration : 1970-? Arguments against Rational Choice School  (NPM, Neo-liberal ideology ) 1. Theories of Democratic Citizenship  Citizens have the capacity to look beyond their self interest to the larger public interest.  Therefore a broader and long term perspective needs to be adopted that requires bonding with community and knowledge of civic affairs which the neo-liberal ideology lacks. Public spirit needs to be nourished and  maintained , and that can be aided by constant attenti...
Read more

Evolution of Public Administration as a Discipline( UPSC CIVIL SERVICE EXAM PREPARATION FOR OPTIONAL SUBJECT ( PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PAPER -1)

 Evolution of Public Administration as a Discipline  The Beginning  Woodrow Wilson's famous 1887 essay " The Study of Administration " was published in political science quarterly.The publication of Wilson's essay is generally regarded as the beginning of public administration as a specific field of study. Wilson sought to move the concerns of public administration to investigation the organization and methods of government offices toward: 1. What government can properly and successfully do;  2. How it can do these proper things with the utmost possible efficiency and at the least possible cost either of money or energy. In his,  Wilson is also credited with positing the existence of major distinction between politics and administration. Wilson had started what become known as the politics-administration dichotomy. Politics and administration could be distinguished, he argued, as the expression of the will of the state  (politics ) and the execution of that...
Read more