PPP & Privatisation : Key Differences

 PPPP & Privatisation : Key Differences

1. Responsibility :

Privatisation -Private sector's 

PPP -Full  retention of responsibility by government 


2. Ownership:

Privatisation -ownership rights sold to private sector along with associated benefits and costs. 

PPP -Government may continue to retain the legal ownership of assets by the public sector 


3. Nature of service: 

Privatisation - Nature and scope of service is determined by private provider. 

PPP  -Contractually determined between the 2 parties 


4. Risk and Rewards : 

Privatisation -All risks inherent in the bussiness rest with the private sector 

PPP -Risks and rewards are shared between the government and the private sector. 


Advantages 

1. Operational Gains: Ensuring that one delivers better or more services for the same price (efficiency gains) or making saving to release money for investment elsewhere .


2.Strategic Clarity:  Partnership contracts enhance accountability by classifying responsibilities and focusing on the key deliverable of a service. The Managerial efficiency of a ministry can benefit significantly as existing financial, human and management resources can be refocused on strategic functions. 


3.Cost Effectiveness : Since selection of Service Provider depends on competition project is more cost effective than before .


4.Higher Productivity : By linking payments to performance, productivity gains may be expected within the project. 


5. Accelerated Delivery : Contracts generally have incentive and penalty clauses vis-a-vis implementation of capital projects which leads to accelerated delivery of projects. 


6.Clear Customer Focus : Shift in focus from service inputs to outputs create the scope for innovation in service delivery and enhances customer satisfaction.  

7. Enhanced Social Service : Social services require a great deal of commitment than sheer professionalism.  In such cases it is community/ voluntary organisation who alone can provide the requisite relief  (e. g. large number of voluntary organisation in India working in municipal services ).

8. Recovery of User Changes: Innovative decisions can be taken with greater flexibility on account of decentralization. Wherever possibilities of recovering user charges exist these can be imposed in harmony with local conditions. 



Risks

●Conflict between various players 

●Inadequate checks monitoring can hamper public intersects 

●Lack of transparency in procedures 

●Fragmentation of health services 

●Cost overruns 

●Monopolistic prices

●User charges are against concept of democracy 

●Lack or poor quality of post-ante performance evaluation 

●Lack of compilation and dissemination of info on PPPs 

●PPPs perceived as only a source of capital 


Some examples 

●The British Government has used PPPs to finance the building of Schools, hospitals for defence contracts and specific capital projects such as the Channel Tunnel Rail Link the National Air Traffic Services and improvements to the London Underground. 

●Social services in Germany and the Netherlands are provided mostly through PPP by non-profit agencies that have a monopoly in these services. 

●PFI (Private Financial Initiative) in UK. India has also used it for development of infrastructure public economic sector and power sector. 

●PPP cell has been created in Ministry of Finance in India. DBFO (Design, build, finance and Operate) division was created in the road sector. 

●Used by bilateral donor or developmental agencies e. s. USAID (United States Agency for International Development ). 

●Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh and Punjab have developed specialized institutions and legislation. They have constituted an agency and passed Acts to promote private sector participation in infrastructure projects across sectors  (Gujarat Insfrastructure Development Board the AP Infrastructure Authority and the Punjab Infrastructure category of States including Karnataka, Rajasthan, Uttaranchal and West Bengal have developed cross - sector facilitation entities but have not passed comprehensive legislation. 

●The Rajasthan Project Development Corporation  (PDCOR )a joint venture to facilitate private investment in infrastructure including policy advisory services to the state government and Institutional support to structure and implement PPPs. 

●Third category of States MP , Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu have relied on sectoral and line agencies to develop and implement PPPs.  In Madhya Pradesh for e. g. Initially the MP Works Department and then the specially created MP Road Development Corporation  (MPRDC) act  as the agency for development of road projects on a BOT basis.

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Public Administration as a Discipline( UPSC CIVIL SERVICE EXAM PREPARATION FOR OPTIONAL SUBJECT ( PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PAPER -1)

 Evolution of Public Administration as a Discipline  The Beginning  Woodrow Wilson's famous 1887 essay " The Study of Administration " was published in political science quarterly.The publication of Wilson's essay is generally regarded as the beginning of public administration as a specific field of study. Wilson sought to move the concerns of public administration to investigation the organization and methods of government offices toward: 1. What government can properly and successfully do;  2. How it can do these proper things with the utmost possible efficiency and at the least possible cost either of money or energy. In his,  Wilson is also credited with positing the existence of major distinction between politics and administration. Wilson had started what become known as the politics-administration dichotomy. Politics and administration could be distinguished, he argued, as the expression of the will of the state  (politics ) and the execution of that will  (adm
Read more

Vroom and Yetton's Contingency Theory

Vroom and Ye tton's  Contingency Theory  This theory is also called the Leader Participation Model. Vroom and Yetton base their analysis on two aspects of a leader's decision : ● Decision Quality: The effect that the decision has on group performance  ●Decision Acceptance : It refers to the motivation and commitment of group members in implementing the decision  Vroom and Yetton identified five leadership styles based on the degree of employee participation and power in making organizational decisions : ● Autocratic  (A-1) : The leader solves the problem himself or makes the decision alone using information available to him at that time. ● Automatic  (A-2): The leader obtains information from his subordinates but the decision on solution is his alone. ●Consultative  (C-1): The leader shares the problem with his subordinates individually . He then makes the decision which mayor may not reflect the influence of his subordinates.  ● Consultative  (C-2): The leader shares the probl
Read more

Herbert Simon's Model of Decision Making

Herbert Simon's Model of Decision Making H erbert Simon analysed the human behaviour in terms of its value preferences in decision making process . It is this central concern that is significant to the understanding of Organization and its working. Classical Theory: Simon's Criticism  Simon criticized the principles of Organization and describes them as mere proverbs. He pointed out that the principles are contradictory and normally inconsistent. He also noted these are scientifically not valid and do not have universal relevance.  Simon questioned their theoretical basis to analyze or  explain the organizational phenomenon. Any theoretical construct should possess a frame of reference which should have universal validity . It is this investigation that led to the growth of the study of administrative behaviour with a focus on authority and decision making.  Unlike the principles which have a contextual relevance the decision making according to Simon is a universal process and
Read more